Home » Working Groups » Subglacial Environments of Changing and Vulnerable Outlet Glaciers
Subglacial Environments of Changing and Vulnerable Outlet Glaciers
- Published:
Scientific Background and Relevance
Conditions in the subsurface of ice sheet outlet glaciers influence the rate and timing of grounding line retreat, exerting a fundamental control on Antarctic ice sheet response to climate forcing, and hence ice loss [1].
Subglacial conditions determine the basal friction that influences the relative contributions of basal sliding and sediment deformation to overall ice flow. Such conditions also impact the production of basal meltwater and its distribution via subglacial hydrology systems, and how basal heat sources, including geothermal heat flow, modulate ice dynamics.
The ice-bedrock interface zone (IBIZ) conditions and processes are particularly critical for major outlet glaciers of Antarctica’s ice sheets, especially those situated on the margins of deep basins, where ice extends well below present day sea level [2]. Many such locations are changing rapidly and vulnerable to further retreat under a warming climate. Despite their importance, subglacial environments remain among the least understood components of pan-Antarctic ice sheet systems. On-ground observations are currently sparse, but recent technology advances (e.g. improved remote power and data telemetry), and computational innovations will drive a step change in knowledge.
A Working Group (WG) focused on Antarctic subglacial environments is therefore urgently needed. This will bring together cutting-edge observational glacier geophysics [2,3,4,5,6] with new modelling strategies [7,8,9], including through novel data assimilation and machine learning methods. The WG will also link to researchers in glacier hydrology, geodesy and geology. By assessing where uncertainties in subglacial conditions have a pivotal impact, the WG will provide a quantitative basis for targeted field campaigns, improve process-based understanding, and hence achieve (in improved ice sheet models) a realistic coupling between basal processes and large-scale ice dynamics.
This WG aligns directly with the Antarctica InSync Theme III: Melting ice sheets and ice shelves and coastal impacts, with a focus on the Land/Ice Sheet area, connecting with Theme I: Southern Ocean and Antarctic heat, freshwater (etc). Understanding the physical controls on glacier motion and retreat is essential for improving projections of rapid ice loss. Quantifying the role of basal sliding, subglacial hydrology, and geothermal heat flow will enable better representation of ice-bed feedbacks in the next generation of coupled ice sheet-Earth system models. These feedbacks determine the rate of inland ice discharge to the ocean, and the potential for large-scale, rapid retreat under certain basal conditions.
Beyond advancing process understanding, the WG would also serve as a bridge between observational, data science, and modelling communities; supporting field-measurement standards, interoperability, and open sharing of subglacial data products. It will coordinate knowledge-sharing frameworks that are usable by the modelling community, particularly during the period of preparation for the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ISMIP7). Through this coordination, the WG will strengthen the international community’s capacity to predict how Antarctic glaciers will evolve under future climate scenarios, hence contributing to improved predictions of the pace and magnitude of Antarctica’s contribution to sea level rise, and of freshwater inputs to the Southern Ocean
Objectives
The overarching aim is to improve knowledge of the subglacial environment, particularly focussing on vulnerable Antarctic glaciers, and how processes in the ice-bed interface influence ice dynamics. The WG will collaboratively coordinate new on-ground data collection, guided by modelling, that will result in important new knowledge of the subglacial environment, ultimately leading to better prediction of ice loss through key Antarctic outlet glaciers.
The scientific objectives of the WG address these key questions:
- How do subglacial conditions – geological structure, including unconsolidated sediments, geothermal heat flow, subglacial hydrology, basal friction – vary across Antarctic glacier catchments and on what length scales? – What processes are active in the upstream and grounding line areas of the outlet glacier, and how do these connect to any adjacent ice shelf?
- How do varying subglacial conditions influence basal ice motion and the susceptibility of glaciers to rapid grounding line retreat under climate change forcing?
The coordination objectives will include:
- Establishing linkages between key international partners, with a particular focus on forging new connections and collaborations between observational, data, and modelling scientists
- Development of standardised measurement protocols (in consultation with other WGs, as appropriate), including essential variables and associated robust uncertainty estimates, that would apply broadly across field programs in West and East Antarctica, as coordinated by National Antarctic Programs and other logistics providers
- Coordination of ground-based on-ice fieldwork activities (linking to airborne surveys) to provide measurements with a focusing on critical subglacial regions of relevance to the anticipated area of grounding line retreat over the coming centuries, and aligning with the primary and landward SCAR RINGS Action Group survey priorities. – Coordination with key stakeholders, including COMNAP
Methods and Approach
The sampling approach has two tiers.
a) Basic instrumentation to be installed and surveys to be carried out on many outlet glaciers.
The aim is to capture essential geometry, englacial and subglacial structure and processes (including seasonal changes).
The use of relatively light logistics will enable many sites to be instrumented.
- Array of passive seismic stations above the grounding line (telemetered, multi-year deployment where possible)
- Point ApRES measurements (telemetered, multi-year deployment)
- Ice surface elevation and velocity measurements, incl. GNSS, photogrammetry, Terrestrial Radar Interferometry
- Indicative on-ground ground-penetrating radar (GPR) survey and active seismic for airborne RES ground-truth.
b) Detailed instrumentation and surveys, co-developing or aligning with other InSync ‘super-site’instrumentation as appropriate.
The aim is to (in addition to aims addressed using the basic instrumentation) inform firn variability in the context of mass balance calculations, subsurface hydrology and basal properties, and glacier processes, which will support activities under Theme 3 Knowledge GapKP3, and link strongly to Theme 7.
- Active seismic surveys (each taking a few days, using a small team)
- Magnetotelluric surveys (two sites can be installed per day, using a small team)
- Airborne geophysical surveys, linking to ICECAP or RINGS protocols.
Target locations for better constraints of structure and process within outlet glacier systems will berefined and optimised using ice sheet modelling.
- Key variables will be identified and protocols developed for standardisation of measurements
- Ice sheet modelling with updated basal boundary conditions from the observations will target improved process based understanding of the glacier response under climate warming scenarios, consistent with protocols currently under development by the ISMIP7 Steering Committee
Expected Outcomes and Deliverables
Scientific outcomes and deliverables will include:
A. Comprehensive mapping of fields in vulnerable glacier catchments within West and East Antarctica, provided on standard grids for use in ice sheet modelling and other activities. Some fields may have a temporal component, as appropriate. Fields include, but are not limited to, those related to:
- Glacier geometry
- Geological substrate
- Subglacial hydrology
- Ice sheet response to ice-bed interactions, climate and ocean forcing on a range of timescales (e.g. glacier response to ocean forcing; surging associated with subglacial hydrology and thermodynamic regimes).
B. Process-based understanding of the influence of subglacial conditions and climate forcing on basal ice motion, incorporating constraints from field observations, innovative AI-enabled analyses, and computer modelling.
C. Scientific publications
- New datasets generated will be published with citable DOIs
- Where appropriate scientific papers will be published that describe the data and/or interpret their significance to improve process-based understanding
- The best case outcome would also see datasets and improved process-based understanding used in ice sheet modelling applications, including the development of ice sheet model representation and parameterisation of subglacial processes (e.g. friction laws)
- All datasets produced will be published according to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reproducible) principles.
D. Contribution to ongoing efforts within SCAR SRP INSTANT (e.g. Theme 2 on Solid Earth-Ice Interactions and subcommittees on Antarctic Geothermal Heat Flow and Antarctic Geological Boundary Conditions)
E. Expand capacity by engaging PhD students, including through fieldwork where possible and through development and application of geophysical data analysis techniques and ice sheet modelling, supported by Team members who have strong track records in mentoring students to deliver novel scientific advances.
F. The above outcomes achieved through an enhanced, inclusive and collegial research culture, with active involvement of early-career researchers and many nations pro-actively encouraged [10].
Timeline / Implementation Plan
| Timeframe | Task |
|---|---|
| Anticipated timeline and ideas | |
| March-July 2026 | Assembly of core team and development of international mailing list |
| e.g. EGU 2026 (May) and/or SCAR OSC 2026 (August) | Splinter meetings at major international conferences |
| by late 2026 | Development of standardised protocols for data collection, linking to ‘super-site’ protocols |
| 2027 | Publish as a White Paper or an interdisciplinary methods/concept paper for a Q1 journal |
Development of policy recommendations pipeline and documentation, linking to InSync knowledge translation |
|
Convenors and Contact Points
Anya Reading
Anya Reading carries out computational and field geophysics, with a focus on the outlet glaciers and dynamic foundations of the Antarctic continent. She leads the ‘Compute Antarctic’ research group in Physics at the University of Tasmania, Australia with a track record in Machine Learning (AI) innovation, and is Director of the GRIT Facility (Geophysical Research Instrumentation for AnTarctica) that is currently enabling new data collection from the fast changing Denman and Totten-Vanderford outlet glacier systems. Field-based investigations with a glacier geophysics focus include icequake detection and AI analysis to determine glacier system processes in collaboration with ice sheet modelers; and passive seismic and multi-instrument transects of the sediment character and subglacial hydrology of the ice-bedrock interface zone. Other analyses include seismic and MT characterization of lithospheric and deep Earth heterogeneity to constrain viscosity inputs to glacial isostatic adjustment models of ice sheet change. Group members also work on geothermal heat flow, and method development in seismology, multivariate, machine learning and AI approaches. Anya works to promote skills development opportunities for early career and graduate student researchers, and is a Director of the Science-Art Festival ‘Beaker Street’. She has broad experience of international science coordination for Antarctica, with roles including co-leadership of the SCAR INSTANT Theme on Earth-Ice Interactions.
Lucas (Luke) Zoet
Lucas (Luke) Zoet’s research focuses on the interaction between glaciers and ice sheets and their underlying beds. He aims to understand glacier sliding and basal friction, which significantly influence ice flow and glacier response to environmental changes. Zoet employs a combination of laboratory experiments, physical modeling, and field observations to investigate ice interactions with both hard and soft glacier beds. A key aspect of his research involves recreating glacier-bed conditions in controlled laboratory settings. In these experiments, he uses novel laboratory devices to examine how ice slides over rigid surfaces and deformable sediments under varying pressures and speeds. These experiments help develop and test mathematical relationships, or “slip laws,” that describe basal motion. Beyond laboratory work, Zoet’s research uses geophysics on modern day glaciers and civil engineering methods on glacier deposits to connect dynamics and kinematics at the bases of glacier to theory. Through this process-oriented approach, his work sheds light on the physical mechanisms governing glacier motion, landform development and enhances the representation of basal processes in models used to study ice dynamics and predict future sea-level rise.
Helen Ockenden
Helen Ockenden’s research focuses on improving boundary conditions for modelling the evolution of the Antarctic ice sheets. She has mainly concentrated on methods for understanding the topography of the bed beneath Antarctica, including geophysical fieldwork and novel inversion techniques, but has also used similar methods to look at the bed of the Greenland Ice Sheet. She is particularly interested in ways to improve the utility of geophysical observations for use in ice sheet models, including extracting new information from existing datasets such as observations of the ice surface and improving parametrisations to include small scale observations in large scale models, such as subglacial roughness and bed conditions. Her current research aims to use machine learning techniques to improve coupling between high-resolution ice sheets and low-resolution oceans in global climate models, in particular to ensure good representation of sub-shelf melting processes.
Integration and Partnerships
Within Antarctica InSync:
This WG will be embedded within Theme III: Melting ice sheets and ice shelves and coastal impacts, linking strongly to the heat and freshwater components of Theme 1: Southern Ocean and Antarctic heat, freshwater, carbon and other elements cycles and their response to climate change. Outcomes from this WG will also inform Theme II (Rapid sea ice decline and its causes and consequences) and Theme VII (Variability, extremes, and tipping points in a changing climate), and we will work closely across InSync themes and partners to ensure that new knowledge is translated into outcomes that benefit end users.
Collaborations with other scientific programs:
We will align with major international efforts to ensure our work contributes to, and benefits from, other initiatives in subglacial processes, glacier dynamics, and ice sheet change. Activities will include:
- Engaging directly in planning new field programs and leveraging existing plans with National Antarctic Programs and other logistics providers to collect novel data, maximising return through coordinated measurement strategies
- Building capacity in the next generation of polar scientists through co-supervised student projects, shared training opportunities, and collaborative proposals that leverage cross-program expertise and resources
- Convening focused workshops that bring together field and data analysis specialists, modellers, and policy stakeholders to accelerate knowledge exchange, define research priorities, and shape future initiatives.
Links with existing initiatives:
We will collaborate closely with existing initiatives, including:
- SCAR-COMNAP RINGS Action Group, e.g. for fieldwork planning to leverage airborne geophysical measurements
- SCAR INSTANT (Theme 2 Solid Earth-Ice interactions; Theme 3 Antarctic contribution to sea level change), to ensure outcomes from fieldwork campaigns will inform process-based data science and modelling advances
- Instrument Facilities with a focus on technology development such as GRIT/GLACI (Australia) and NERC GEF (UK)
- The Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ISMIP7) to ensure that new datasets produced through fieldwork campaigns have a pipeline to continental-scale modelling initiatives.
References
- [1] Matsuoka et al. (2025). Towards an improved understanding of the Antarctic coastal zone and its contribution to future global sea level rise, under review at Reviews of Geophysics, doi: 10.22541/essoar.175241971.19851046/v1
- [2] Kelly, I. D., Reading, A. M., Stål, T., Kulessa, B., García-Jerez, A., Piña-Flores, J., Paolucci, E., Tanzini, A., Turner, R.J., Magyar, J. C., and Bassom, A. P. (2026). Determining the Character of Subglacial Sediments in the Ice-Bedrock Interface Zone of Antarctica Using Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratios (HVSRs) of Seismic Ambient Noise. Submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.
- [3] Podolskiy, E. A., & F. Walter (2016). Cryoseismology. Reviews of Geophysics, 54,708–758, doi: 10.1002/2016RG00052
- [4] Agnew, Ronan S., Emma Pearce, Marianne Karplus, Meghana Ranganathan, Andrew O. Hoffman, Madeline Hunt, Andrew Pretorius, et al. (2026). Active and Passive Seismic Surveys over the Grounding Zone of Eastwind Glacier, Antarctica. Seismological Research Letters 97 (1): 591–605. [Link]
- [5] Vaňková, Irena, J. Paul Winberry, Sue Cook, Keith W. Nicholls, Chad A. Greene, and Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi (2023). High Spatial Melt Rate Variability near the Totten Glacier Grounding Zone Explained by New Bathymetry Inversion. Geophysical Research Letters 50 (10). [Link]
- [6] Gadi, Ratnakar, Eric Rignot, Dimitris Menemenlis, and Bernd Scheuchl (2025). Contrasting Melt Regime in the Ice Grounding Zone of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 122 (48): e2512626122. [Link]
- [7] Pelle, T., Greenbaum, J. S., Ehrenfeucht, S., Dow, C. F., & McCormack, F. S. (2024). Subglacial discharge accelerates dynamic retreat of Aurora Subglacial Basin outlet glaciers, East Antarctica, over the 21st century. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 129, e2023JF007513, doi: 10.1029/2023JF00751
- [8] Ehrenfeucht, S., Dow, C., McArthur, K., Morlighem, M., & McCormack, F. S. (2025). Antarctic wide subglacial hydrology modeling. Geophysical Research Letters, 52, doi: 10.1029/2024GL111386
- [9] Coulon, Violaine, Jan De Rydt, Thomas Gregov, Qing Qin, and Frank Pattyn (2024). Future Freshwater Fluxes from the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Geophysical Research Letters 51 (23). [Link]
- [10] Karplus, Marianne S., Tun Jan Young, Sridhar Anandakrishnan, Jeremy N. Bassis, Elizabeth H. Case, Anna J. Crawford, Anne Gold, et al. (2022). Strategies to Build a Positive and Inclusive Antarctic Field Work Environment. Annals of Glaciology 63 (87–89): 125–31. [Link]